Show Posts
|
|
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7 ... 16
|
|
61
|
General Category / General Discussion / Re: What packages you running? (Debian/Ubuntu users)
|
on: January 05, 2010, 01:17:26 AM
|
|
I've not had too many problems, and because package counts are generally very low on Shevaplug compared to full server and desktop installations of Debian/Ubuntu, the chances of package problems is greatly reduced too.
I do a full update every month, and don't think I have ever encountered a problem. Running old versions of packages comes with their own problems too. Transmission web interface failed to work at all on Opera for me, on the Lenny "stable" distro, but works fine in the "unstable"...
|
|
|
|
|
65
|
General Category / General Discussion / Re: What packages you running? (Debian/Ubuntu users)
|
on: January 04, 2010, 12:30:47 PM
|
Debian-Lenny on a 8gb SD card. There are a couple that I compiled an installed manually, not on this list.. Like Transmission.. apt-get got me version 1.22?!? I downloaded 1.76 and compiled/installed it myself..  That's precisely why I opted for Debian Squeeze rather than Lenny, as the packages in Lenny are so out of date...
|
|
|
|
|
66
|
General Category / General Discussion / Re: Competition to the plug?
|
on: January 04, 2010, 12:26:57 PM
|
|
However Apple will spend lots of money on marketing, and consumers will then buy whatever crap Apple want to sell them regardless of how good or bad it is, in comparision to competing products.
I have long since worked out that best technology or best value does not mean best sales any more, if you have pretty adverts and comes with a "uban chic" created by the manufacturer, then you can sell sub-par stuff to the mass market consumers that are too stupid (or lazy) to bother to explore alternatives. Many examples of this (iPhone, iPod, Wii, Xbox360 all inferior to their counterparts, but sell well due to advertising/marketing/virual marketing/astroturfing)
|
|
|
|
|
68
|
General Category / Success stories / Re: get_iplayer
|
on: December 31, 2009, 08:29:02 AM
|
|
Hi, can you elerboate how to use this? What do you get at the end of it? Unencrpyted files for streaming on the home network? Does it support the HD iPlayer streams?
|
|
|
|
|
71
|
General Category / General Discussion / Re: Setting Up Mail Server
|
on: December 29, 2009, 11:12:39 AM
|
|
I have Postfix/Dovecot combo working excellently on Debian Squeeze on my plug. I just apt-get installed them, and did a bit of tweaking to the mailbox locations, so they didn't live on flash, but on my USB HDD. I also integrated spamassassin into postfix chain, and have a dovecot sieve that sorts spam into a IMAP spam inbox when it sees the spamassassin mail header.
It's pretty straightward, if you need any specific help, more than happy to try and help out.
|
|
|
|
|
72
|
General Category / General Discussion / Re: Benefits/Downsides to moving to SDHC based booting.
|
on: December 28, 2009, 06:29:43 AM
|
plug:~# hdparm -tT /dev/mmcblk0
/dev/mmcblk0: Timing cached reads: 432 MB in 2.00 seconds = 215.84 MB/sec Timing buffered disk reads: 56 MB in 3.00 seconds = 18.64 MB/sec
Mine: (Transcend 4GB SDHC) sheeva:~# hdparm -tT /dev/mmcblk0 /dev/mmcblk0: Timing cached reads: 634 MB in 2.00 seconds = 316.65 MB/sec Timing buffered disk reads: 58 MB in 3.03 seconds = 19.12 MB/sec
|
|
|
|
|
73
|
Hardware and U-Boot firmware / Hardware / Re: NAND device: ......Bad eraseblock
|
on: December 27, 2009, 02:48:36 PM
|
|
Here is mine:
NAND device: Manufacturer ID: 0xad, Chip ID: 0xdc (Hynix NAND 512MiB 3,3V 8-bit) Scanning device for bad blocks Bad eraseblock 249 at 0x000001f20000 Bad eraseblock 639 at 0x000004fe0000 Bad eraseblock 1200 at 0x000009600000 Bad eraseblock 1461 at 0x00000b6a0000 Bad eraseblock 1581 at 0x00000c5a0000 Bad eraseblock 1608 at 0x00000c900000 Bad eraseblock 1778 at 0x00000de40000 Bad eraseblock 1796 at 0x00000e080000 Bad eraseblock 1801 at 0x00000e120000 Bad eraseblock 1864 at 0x00000e900000 Bad eraseblock 1970 at 0x00000f640000 Bad eraseblock 2021 at 0x00000fca0000
|
|
|
|
|